Most viewed

Chapter 2: Description in Glenn, Cheryl. Amusement parks could also have height limits, so short children will not fly out of their seats. Each argument of argumentative essay should be..
Read more
Everybodys happy nowadays." (91). For the contemporary reader, community" is understood as a group of diverse people, while in World State, people are essentially manufactured to be sorted into one of..
Read more

Tok essay criteria 2012


tok essay criteria 2012

prescribed title and demonstrates a rudimentary understanding of them. The essay on the prescribed title is very poorly structured, with little overall organization. The inquiry explores knowledge issues. Some counterclaims are considered. Factual information used to support arguments is correct. Are you able to critically reflect on your own viewpoint?

Lance armstrong essays, Bill bryson discovery essay,

The student has shaped the essay in a way that shows personal engagement with the knowledge issues. Are the arguments compelling? Essay especially in ib score time to your tok essay plan. Careful: Is the knowledge issue relevant to the prescribed title? Left see the essay for tok essays. Concepts are used clearly and, where appropriate, refined by helpful explanations. There is very little evidence of any awareness of counterclaims. Concepts are used or developed clearly: some explanations are included, where appropriate. C - Quality of analysis of knowledge issues Level 1 is not achieved. 3-4 Some links to areas of knowledge and/or ways of knowing have been attempted but they are largely ineffective. Some effective links are drawn between areas of knowledge and/or ways of knowing. Sources of information and ideas may not be acknowledged and there is no attempt at referencing.

TOK, essay 2012, question



tok essay criteria 2012


Sitemap